Auction Theory Simulator: First-Price, Vickrey & English Auctions

simulator intermediate ~8 min
Loading simulation...
Vickrey Revenue ≈ $97 — second-price auction with truthful bidding

With 5 bidders (mean value $100, spread $30) in a Vickrey auction, the seller's expected revenue is approximately $97. The winner pays the second-highest bid, and truthful bidding is a dominant strategy, guaranteeing allocative efficiency.

Formula

Vickrey: winner pays second-highest bid; dominant strategy = bid true value
First-price optimal bid (uniform values): b(v) = v · (n-1)/n
Revenue Equivalence: E[Revenue] is equal across standard auction formats (under IPV)

Auction Theory

Auctions are among the oldest and most common mechanisms for allocating scarce resources. From ancient Roman slave markets to modern spectrum auctions worth billions of dollars, the principles of auction design shape how value is discovered and distributed. Game theory provides the framework for understanding how rational bidders should behave — and how auctioneers can design mechanisms to achieve desired outcomes.

Three Auction Formats

First-Price Sealed-Bid: Each bidder submits a secret bid. The highest bidder wins and pays their bid. The strategic challenge: bid too high and you leave money on the table; bid too low and you might lose. Rational bidders engage in bid shading, bidding below their true value. The optimal amount of shading depends on the number of competitors and the distribution of values.

Second-Price Sealed-Bid (Vickrey): Bidders submit sealed bids, but the winner pays the second-highest bid. William Vickrey's remarkable insight (1961): truthful bidding — bidding exactly your private value — is a dominant strategy. No matter what others do, you cannot do better than bidding your value. This makes the Vickrey auction strategy-proof and allocatively efficient.

English (Ascending): The classic open auction. The price rises continuously, and bidders drop out when the price exceeds their value. The last bidder standing wins at a price just above the second-highest value — yielding outcomes equivalent to the Vickrey auction under private values.

Revenue Equivalence

One of the most surprising results in auction theory is the Revenue Equivalence Theorem. Under standard assumptions (independent private values, risk-neutral bidders, symmetric equilibrium), all four standard auction formats — first-price, second-price, English, and Dutch — yield exactly the same expected revenue to the seller. Adjust the 'Auction Type' slider to compare revenues across formats and see this theorem in action.

Beyond Theory: Practical Design

In practice, auctions deviate from the idealized model. Risk-averse bidders bid more aggressively in first-price auctions (increasing revenue). Common value components create the 'winner's curse'. Collusion and entry deterrence add strategic complexity. Roger Myerson's optimal auction design (1981) showed how reserve prices and handicapping can maximize revenue. These insights have been applied to FCC spectrum auctions, Google's ad auctions, and Treasury bond sales worldwide.

FAQ

What is a Vickrey auction?

A Vickrey auction (second-price sealed-bid auction) is an auction where bidders submit sealed bids, the highest bidder wins, but pays the second-highest bid. William Vickrey proved in 1961 that truthful bidding — bidding exactly your private value — is a dominant strategy, making this mechanism both efficient and incentive-compatible.

What is bid shading?

Bid shading is the practice of bidding below your true value in a first-price auction. Since the winner pays their own bid, rational bidders shade their bids downward to increase their surplus if they win. The optimal amount of shading depends on the number of bidders and the distribution of values.

What is the Revenue Equivalence Theorem?

The Revenue Equivalence Theorem, proved by Vickrey (1961) and generalized by Myerson (1981) and Riley & Samuelson (1981), states that under certain conditions (independent private values, risk-neutral bidders, symmetric equilibrium), all standard auction formats yield the same expected revenue to the seller.

Which auction format generates the most revenue?

Under the assumptions of the Revenue Equivalence Theorem, all standard formats are equivalent. In practice, differences arise from risk aversion (favoring first-price), common value components (favoring English auctions), and asymmetric bidders. The 'optimal auction' design by Myerson (1981) can further increase revenue through reserve prices.

Sources

Embed

<iframe src="https://homo-deus.com/lab/game-theory/auction-theory/embed" width="100%" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe>
View source on GitHub